Oooh, what is it..? Ok, it could be nice, but in fullview too unreal and Maybee you should

I´M SOOO SORRY..

Just wanted to say.. that those transitions are too visible and look too unnatural in fullview.. But.. i´m puzzled... I thought it´s not a photo.. (just a manipulation of a previous photo) but.. it IS..?? The car is not there!! It is a new photo! Isn´t it..? Hmmm.. Now I´m gonna find ten differences, ok? Byee!

...quite a mysterious message!

lol



--
:: coincidence does NOT exist...!

...it's a brand new photo! "unreal" look was the target, "unnatural" look in FV is side effect of lack of quality. when i was there i wasn't sure how cropped the original was so i took the shot much wider and this is only a tiny slice of it. secondly, it was taken by a borrowed office camera and it's not so much modified as it seems to be. the sky is clear, but the rest with the highlited areas is just a little experiment with blending and is too sharp, i know. unfortunately i didn't have much time to play around.

...fault is i submitted it in too large resolution, but doesn't it look great in preview? i might resubmit in smaller resampled (softing cubic resampling) resolution, which would look a bit smoother.

...thanks for comment(s)



--
:: coincidence does NOT exist...!

To je kouzelny...

...diky, to je me oblibene misto.

--
:: coincidence does NOT exist...!